Sometimes as a food writer (okay, an enthusiastic dilettante, but cut me some slack here) it’s difficult to balance my expectations of a place with that of other diners, and then to evaluate this with that singular expectation that may be considered an ‘objective view’. We all know that one man’s meat is another man’s poison and it is for this reason that blogs and other forums have become so stunningly popular in the last few years. People love to share and maybe even argue their differing opinions. But at the end of the day despite what I may think on an ‘objective’ level, when I go out for dinner (or lunch or brunch) I do feel that there is a fundamental degree of satisfaction that I would prefer to be met.
So it’s with some ambiguity and an unspecified degree of disappointment that I write my ten cents worth about Le Chateaubriand. For those of you who don’t like reading the (admittedly long-winded) text and would rather stick to the photos and thumbs-up or down approach, I’ll cut to the chase: this place is so inappropriately named as to be hilarious. After dropping 145 euro I came away feeling remarkably disappointed, and sadly remained unsated. Of course to be fair, if you went there the following night you may have had a totally different (i.e. wonderful) experience in comparison with what I talk about here. But to put it simply, after the dinner we had I’d have real problems recommending anyone to Le Chateaubriand and not feeling guilty for doing so. … read more »